I personally don’t want them to remake old songs for new albums.
If they want to do one and release it on the web, great. If that slows down album progress, bad.
I like the past for what it is, but I want new stuff more.
I wonder if the album, when released, will contain some song that they never played in public. Do many bands do that anymore?
On one extreme, you’ve got AC/DC…they go into the studio in 2008 with some ideas and pop out an album, Black Ice, of 15 songs that nobody had ever heard before. Some of the songs were awesome, some of the songs sucked. Would road-testing the songs have yielded an even better album?
Then you’ve got the TS/MW/TTH method of developing songs on the stage and displaying the progress for everyone to see…and when the album is released it’s in what I’d call the “wouldn’t change a note” category, but is also full of familiar tunes.
Which is best?
Of course, then you’ve got Back in Black…but that’s the rare case of an album full of unheard material that kicks ass from start to finish.